You Are Not A Gadget
Language defines, or at least provides structure for our thoughts and therefore our actions. A language without singular pronouns is probably used by a culture that sees the world as made up of groups. How would this culture act versus a culture whose language uses the first person singular pronoun in every sentence? Would one culture be more prone to narcissism? Would one focus on the good of the group over the individual? If we were building a language today and could see how its structure was constraining our culture how should we change it?
In computing this is even more true because the language and its structures are the foundation of thought on how programs will function. It places limitations on what the program can perform or at least makes some things easier to perform and makes others much more difficult to achieve.
Now think about how hard it is to understand these restrictions from within the system itself. What sudden blow to your understanding of the world would be needed to see it? Jaron Lanier delivers that shock with “You Are Not A Gadget.” Lock-in of structures from computer languages restrict us and disregard our humanity. The drop-down lists of relationship types, religions, ethnicities and the like on Facebook pigeonhole us as individuals and the strict layout of profile pages hide our unique and messy personalities. Crowdsourcing is not the answer to everything and subsumes the unique individual into the masses. Online anonymity releases the inner troll in us all. Open-source culture makes the building blocks of culture of greater value than the original composition and strips context from the content. We have stopped being original and merely churn through the detritus of past decades. The promise of the web in the mid nineties has let us down.
Alternately sounding like a truth-teller and a crank Lanier rails against the limits of MIDI, status updates on Twitter and Facebook, open-source culture, the lack of original music since the 1980s, Wikipedia, search engine optimization and belief in the Singularity. It’s not hard to find chinks in his arguments and overreaching leaps, but focusing on those errors avoids the real issues that he delves into. Anyone who works with web 2.0 and espouses openness owes it to themselves to read this opposing view and not dismiss Lanier as a late hippie lamenting the good old days and unrealized promise that they held.




Vacation home bathroom cabinet tends to highlight the dangers of vacation rather than the joys.

I suppose that I should be thinking “Wow, I can have my Pringles AND the added benefit of fiber too.” But instead I’m thinking “Who is Pringles trying to fool?” These are are starch filled, molded, salty beyond belief, “crisps” in a can. Any benefit that fiber they have added is going to give me will be a negligible health benefit compared to the salt and empty calories.

